Liberty University Exploratory Case Study Model Analysis

Description

Exploratory Case Study Assignment Instructions
Overview
In this Module: Week, you will demonstrate your knowledge of preparing and collecting case study (evidence) data. The overview used the term process as you will not only develop a case study protocol and explain the use of pilot studies, but dive into the sources of data, and how to comprehensively collect and care for your study’s data. Finally, you will scratch the surface of the first type – Exploratory Case Study. 
Instructions
After reviewing the Learn material for the Module: Week, address the following paper in current APA format:
1. Develop Case Study protocol as it relates to describing how to screen candidate cases and select final cases
2. Explain why, when, and how to use pilot case studies
3. Describe and triangulate the six sources of evidence
4. Explain the purpose and requirements of a comprehensive case study database (consider from raw data to final conclusion and the reader may need access to all data to draw their own conclusions)
5. Draft an Exploratory Case Study Model that determines whether a topic is worthy of further investigation and serve as a prelude to a survey or experiment (use Yin’s (2018) Application #1 [p. 66] as a template)
 
 
  

3 attachmentsSlide 1 of 3attachment_1attachment_1attachment_2attachment_2attachment_3attachment_3

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Exploratory Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202230
Criteria
Abstract,
Introduction
Case Study
Protocol &
Pilot Case
Studies
Sources of
Evidence
and How to
Triangulate
Ratings
Points
5 to >4.0 pts
4 to >3.0 pts
3 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Abstract clearly states the
purpose and main
conclusion and Introduction
provides a complete
overview of the discussion.
Abstract and
Introduction provides
a partial purpose,
main conclusion, and
overview of the
discussion.
Abstract and
Introduction present but
does not provide an
overview of the
discussion.
Not
completed.
10 to >9.0 pts
9 to >7.0 pts
7 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Section provides a
complete discussion of
case study protocol and
how it relates to screening
candidate/final cases and
provides a comprehensive
explanation of the why,
when and how to use pilot
case studies. Flow is
logical and fully cited.
Section provides a
partial discussion of
case study protocol
and how it relates to
screening
candidate/final cases
and provides a partial
explanation of the
why, when and how to
use pilot case
studies. Flow is
mostly logical and
partially cited.
Section provides a
minimal discussion of
case study protocol and
how it relates to
screening
candidate/final cases
and provides a minimal
explanation of the why,
when and how to use
pilot case studies. Flow
is not logical and/or
insufficiently cited.
Not
completed or
not related to
requirements
for the
section.
10 to >9.0 pts
9 to >7.0 pts
7 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Section provides a
complete and thorough
discussion of the 6 sources
of evidence and how to
triangulate. Flow is logical
and fully cited.
Section provides a
partial discussion of
the 6 sources of
evidence and how to
triangulate. Flow is
mostly logical and
partially cited.
Section provides a
minimal discussion of
the 6 sources of
evidence and how to
triangulate. Flow is not
logical and/or
insufficiently cited.
Not
completed or
not related to
requirements
for the
section.
5 pts
10 pts
10 pts
Exploratory Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202230
Criteria
Case Study
Database
Exploratory
Case Study
Model
Ratings
Points
10 to >9.0 pts
9 to >7.0 pts
7 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Section provides a
complete and thorough
explanation of the purpose
and requirements of an
all-inclusive case study
database. Flow is logical
and fully cited. Section
provides a complete and
thorough discussion of the
6 sources of evidence and
how to triangulate. Flow is
logical and fully cited.
Section provides a
partial explanation of
the purpose and/or
requirements of an
all-inclusive case
study database. Flow
is mostly logical and
partially cited.
Section provides a
minimal explanation of
the purpose and/or
requirements of an
all-inclusive case study
database. Flow is not
logical and/or
insufficiently cited.
Not
completed or
not related to
requirements
for the
section.
10 to >9.0 pts
9 to >7.0 pts
7 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Demonstrates critical
thinking to include analysis,
evaluation, and synthesis
of the material by ‘drafting’
a broad-strokes
Exploratory Case Study
that specifically determines
whether a topic is worthy of
investigation and serves as
a prelude to a survey or
experiment.
Mostly synthesized
the material by
partially ‘drafting’ a
broad-strokes
Exploratory Case
Study that specifically
determines whether a
topic is worthy of
investigation and/or
serves as a prelude
to a survey or
experiment.
Only minimally
demonstrated critical
thinking, analysis,
evaluation, and/or
limited synthesis by
‘drafting’ a broad-strokes
Exploratory Case Study
that specifically
determines whether a
topic is worthy of
investigation and/or
serves as a prelude to a
survey or experiment.
Not
completed or
not related to
requirements
for the
section.
7 to >6.0 pts
6 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Conclusion provides
a partial summary of
the discussion and
highlights at least one
key points and some
biblical integration is
present.
Conclusion present but
Not
does not summarize
completed.
discussion or highlight
key points and little to no
biblical integration is
present.
Conclusion & 8 to >7.0 pts
Biblical
Integration
Advanced
Conclusion provides a
complete summary of the
discussion and highlights
key points and robust
biblical integration is
present.
10 pts
10 pts
8 pts
Exploratory Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B02_202230
Criteria
Ratings
Points
Mechanics,
11 to >10.0 pts
Composition,
Grammar,
Advanced
Word Count
Mechanics, Composition, &
Word Count is thorough
(1600-2400 words).
10 to >8.0 pts
8 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
11 pts
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Mechanics,
Composition, & Word
Count is satisfactory
(+/- 2%).
Mechanics,
Composition, & Word
Count is insufficient (+/3-4%).
There are
many errors
in
mechanics,
composition,
grammar or
Word Count
(>4% diff).
APA Format, 11 to >10.0 pts
Structure, &
References
Advanced
and Citations
Proper cover page and
section headings included.
Met all of the required
formatting. References
exceed requirements in
number and quality and/or
most statements are
supported by a variety of
citations.
10 to >8.0 pts
8 to >0.0 pts
0 pts
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Proper cover page
and section headings
included. Met most of
the required
formatting.
References meet
requirements in
number and quality
and/or many
statements are
supported by a
variety of citations.
No cover page and/or
section headings
included. Met some
required formatting.
References do not meet
requirements in number
and quality and/or some
statements are
supported by a variety of
citations.
No structure
or formatting
provided.
Missing
references
and/or
citations are
rare,
repetitious or
non-existent.
11 pts
Total Points: 75

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Explanation & Answer:
2400 Words

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.